Not really, as the rights for those tracks belong to publishers who own that game.Peyko said:
I believe that BB are trying to integrate SP and MP, so as such there may not be a "Single Player" thats seperate to "Multi"Matrix404 said:
Lari Fari said:
I think it's safe to say that for console games(Forza is Xbox only) there are less hackers. Majority of people who create mods/cracks are on PC platform, so I think that it's one of the reasons that there are more trainers and mods for PC games too. I have no facts, and I'm just assumpting, you may prove me wrong.St. Jimmy said:
They can't, as they're licensed for Flatout, and Bugbear doesn't own the rights for them.Peyko said:
I do see the good points in combined multiplayer/single player career, but for me career mode is kinda supposed to be single player. I'm not completely opposite to seamless online/single player career, but I guess I'm somewhat against it, since I'm kinda used to the fact that in career modes, you're usually the best. You're the one winning, or almost winning the races - the star. Online, you have to really work on that, I mean, you have to have actual talent to be the best. I know I don't have that in me, and it would be nice to get some first places too sometimes - even if it's against bots. But I do love the challenge, I don't want it to be easy, I want it to be an actual challenge to get to first, but not Brian/BenDover challenge. Not everyone in real life can be star in racing, yeah, but don't forget that it's just a game.Mopower said:
Well, at the beginning of that post you said, tht you are against online/offline semless career. But during most of your text you gave arguments for it... Did you realize it would be better while writing that?Frisker said:
So far the talk has been having your SP career opponents to be asynchronous driving profiles of real human players, like it's in Forza 5, Forza Horizon 2 etc. So they will have personality but they just won't be arbitrarily named computer AI. I know many liked the opponents from Flatout but they also don't feel like real opponents and then there's always the silent voice in the back of your head telling that you are playing against non-living opponents in a video game. Which is not a bad thing per se, but not the experience we're after. I hope you see what I mean.Purple44 said:
I'm not a designer at Bugbear so the final call will be made by Jori & co, but my 2 cents, like already said in this thread, is that MP rewards should be somewhat higher due several reasons like added difficulty, delay from starting next race, inability to restart etc.Purple44 said:
Exactly. AI opponents also add to the pot, not just as much as human players, unless the AI difficulty is compareable to human players, which remains to be seen. The amounts of money every player/AI adds to the pot will be decided and tuned later with lots of playtesting for economy balance. It's not rocket science.Purple44 said:
Again, not my call but my hunch is that every participant will get their share of the pot of money, depending on their finishing position, whether it's 13th or 24th and DNF.Purple44 said:
Good question. My opinion is that lap counts could affect the size of the pot, because the more laps you have, the more damaged your car might be, so the more expensive the repairs will be. But it's not that straightforward, because you could have 60 laps race with your friends and just drive carefully without damaging your car at all. Or in clean racing servers you don't even have to "cheat", everyone will drive more carefully anyway. But I believe Jori will handle this issue well among others.Purple44 said:
Both online and offline events are the same, you can create completely your own event with your own lap counts, amounts of AI, how many human players can join if any (Note that the player will decide the total amount of opponents based on the performance their computer can handle, and then the human players will "override" the AI if it's open for public) etc. rules. In the event selection screen we will give you ability to create that own event, we show you currently online servers and then selection of pre-made events (think of them as quick settings, so you don't have to go through creating an event) from which you can choose and when you select one, you can also decide are you going to host it for other human players or do you just go race against AI. I hope we can show you a sketch of how it might look like in the upcoming blog posts so you get better idea what I mean.Purple44 said:
Can't say about details yet, they're Jori's concern. 1v1 derby in my mind is not out of the question if someone really wants to do it, so forcing a minimum amount of players/AI is not mandatory in my opinion. But I'll let Jori decide.Purple44 said:
Guess I forgot that midway throughLari Fari said:Well, at the beginning of that post you said, tht you are against online/offline semless career. But during most of your text you gave arguments for it... Did you realize it would be better while writing that?Frisker said:
This sounds and feels like: "Play MP alone with AI".Tero said:
That's the wording I was after. I mean, it'd feel like Counter Strike, you can play it alone against bots, but what's the point? Is there anyone who actually does that? Since there's no real point to it.Cono said:
This is a serious problem and bothers me alot.Frisker said:That's the wording I was after. I mean, it'd feel like Counter Strike, you can play it alone against bots, but what's the point? Is there anyone who actually does that? Since there's no real point to it.Cono said:
Sure the difference between CS and Wreckfest would be that in CS there isn't any career mode or anything, just matches. But I hope you get my point
For that kind of things, I always go back to Destruction Derby 2, where there are tracks I'm good at, and tracks I suck at, and the whole point of a season, is to win the tracks you're good at, and improve the ones you suck at.Tero said:
